Bank of India may provide the information that whether strikers were paid salary or principle of no work no pay applied on them
Enter Registration Number BKOIN/R/E/21/01438
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 22/12/2021
Public Authority Bank of India
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED
Date of action 22/12/2021
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 2266684566
Email Id ho[dot]rticell[at]bankofindia[dot]co[dot]in
Online RTI Request Form Details
RTI Request Details :-
RTI Request Registration number BKOIN/R/E/21/01438
Public Authority Bank of India
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Details not provided
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Description of Information Sought
RTI Communique is attached to this online application in PDF form.
Concerned CPIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
CPIO may provide the following information point
wise as follows.
1-I had visited the branch office Mirzapur of Bank
of India on 16th and 17th December 2021, the door was
locked and no feedback regarding the strike was available. Neighbours told me
that bank will open on Monday.
Please provide the feedback like post and designation of the staffs of
Bank of India who had given permission to close the branch to concerned branch
officer.
2-Apex court of India had categorically passed the
order no work no pay
3-Please provide the detail of the staff those were on the leave on on
16th and 17th December 2021.
4-Please provide the reason of keeping the branch office gate closed
without a notice on the board/gate regarding the strikes as caused great
hardships to customers cum visitors.
5-Provide the details of staffs at the branch office Mirzapur went on
strike voluntarily and also those were coerced to go on strike.
Bank employees display placards as
they shout slogans during a protest, as part of a two-day long nationwide bank
strike against the privatisation of public sector banks. (REUTERS)2 min read . Updated: 17 Dec 2021, 03:25
PM ISTLivemint
·
As bank strike continues for second
day, banking and ATM services have been severely hit across the country.
·
Nearly 8,590 branches and most ATMs
shut operations as protest continues for second day in West Bengal.
Listen to this article
As the protest against the Centre's move to
privatise government-owned banks entered the second day, services have been hit
across the country as employees of several public sector banks, including State
Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB), and Bank of Baroda continue
their protest. Public sector lenders, including SBI had informed customers that
services in their branches might be affected due to the strike.
Additionally, West Bengal has reported that Banking
operations in the state were severely affected for the second consecutive day
on Friday as lakhs of employees and officers of public sector lenders continued
their nationwide strike. Shutters of around 8,590 bank branches and most ATMs
were down during the day as the United Forum of Bank Union (UFBU), an umbrella
body of nine associations, observed the two-day strike from December 16.
In the Union Budget for 2021-22 presented in
February, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had proposed to take up
privatisation of two public sector banks. To facilitate it, the government has
listed the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021, for introduction and passage
during the current session of Parliament.
"Besides the two-day strike, a series of
protest programmes will be held if the government does not withdraw the
bill," All India Bank Officers Confederation general secretary Sanjay Das
said. He also stated the government's decision to privatise PSBs will adversely
impact the country's economy, priority sector lending and credit flow to
self-help groups and rural entrepreneurs.
"Around 70 per cent of the country's total
deposits are with the PSBs, and handing over these banks to private lenders
will put people's money deposited with PSBs in danger," Das added.
The United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU), an umbrella
body of nine bank unions with over 10 lakh bank employees and officers, has
given the call for a two-day nationwide strike on December 16 and 17.
Bank unions participating in the strike include All
India Bank Employees Association (AIBEA), All India Bank Officers'
Confederation (AIBOC), National Confederation of Bank Employees (NCBE), All
India Bank Officers' Association (AIBOA), Bank Employees Federation of India
(BEFI), Indian National Bank Employees Federation (INBEF), Indian National Bank
Officers Congress (INBOC), National Organisation of Bank Workers (NOBW) and
National Organisation of Bank Officers (NOBO).
Banking and ATM services have been affected by the
strike. Most public sector banks have already warned their customers about the
possible impact of the strike on the services.
State Bank of India (SBI) said in a regulatory
filing to the stock exchanges: "United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) has
served a Notice of Strike, informing that the members of the constituent Unions
of UFBU viz. AIBEA, AIBOC, NCBE, AIBOA, BEFI, INBEF, and INBOC propose to go on
a nationwide Bank Strike on 16th and 17th December 2021, in support of their
demands."
"We advise that while the Bank has made
necessary arrangements to ensure normal functioning in its branches and offices
on the days of strike, it is likely that work in our Bank may be impacted by
the Strike," said the SBI.
Principle Of 'No Work No Pay' Applies When Employee Was Not Kept Away From Work By Any Order Of Employer: SC [Read Judgment]
ReplyDelete"Nobody could be directed to claim wages for the period that he remained absent without leave or without justification." The Supreme Court has observed that the principle of 'No Work No Pay' can be applied when the employee was not kept away from work by any order of the employer. The bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha, reiterated the settled principle that nobody could be directed to claim wages for the period that he remained absent without leave or without justification.