Whether it is not reflecting rampant corruption in working of Chauki in-charge


संदर्भ संख्या : 40019921018163 , दिनांक - 06 Nov 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :
शिकायत संख्या:-40019921018163
आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Mauryaविषय-शिकायत संख्या:-40019921017164 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Mauryaविषय-आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-40019921010071आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya, शिकायत संख्या:-40019921009611 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya,शिकायत संख्या:-40019921009345 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya, शिकायत संख्या:-40019921013755 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya,शिकायत संख्या:-40019921013754 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya, शिकायत संख्या:-40019921014239 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya and शिकायत संख्या:-60000210094506 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan MauryaIn the aforementioned matter, police took the recourse that they are not technical expert so the investigation is not feasible by the police unless a technical expert may provide its report. For the enquiry by a technical expert, chauki in-charge Bali Maurya forwarded the matter to the executive officer municipality Mirzapur city and a thorough enquiry was carried out by the engineer municipality Mirzapur city and enquiry report dated-31/08/2021 letter number-194 was submitted before executive officer, municipality Mirzapur city.  According to report of sub inspector Umesh Ray dated-07-09-2021 attached as page 2  of the attached PDF document to this representation, police will act on the report of Executive Engineer municipality Mirzapur city not on the report of city Engineer of the Municipality Mirzapur city.  Report of the Executive Engineer municipality Mirzapur city dated-09-09-2021 is attached to the representation as  page 1  of the attached PDF document to this representation as well as this report received by the office of the office of the chauki in charge and office of Kotwal, Kotwali Katra District-Mirzapur.  Circle officer City, Prabhat Ray had promised in its office located in police line to take action in the matter after the report of  Executive Engineer municipality Mirzapur city when applicant met him in regard to matter on 07 Aug 2021 afternoon aongwith social worker Yogi M. P. Singh.  Rest of the information may be taken by taking the perusal of शिकायत संख्या:-40019921017164 आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Maurya which has been C -categorised on the Jansunwai portal because of the bogus report of the sub inspector Umesh Ray. 
विभाग -पुलिसशिकायत श्रेणी -
नियोजित तारीख-16-09-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-
स्तर -थाना स्तरपद -थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक
प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-
प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक20-09-2021 को फीडबैक:-JANCH ADHIKARI BHARAST HAI आवेदक का कहना है की झूटी आख्या लगायी जा रही ये मुख्यमंत्री जी छबी ख़राब कर रहे है गलत आख्या लगा रहे है कृपया जाँच सही से क्र के आख्या लगाये शिकायत कर्ता द्वारा बताया गया है की अभी तक पूर्ण कार्यवाही नहीं किया गया अधुरा समाधान किया गया ,आवेदक असहमत है ,कृपया समस्या का जल्द से जल्द उचित समाधान किया जाये ,
फीडबैक की स्थिति -वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक द्वारा सी - श्रेणीकृत
संलग्नक देखें -Click here
नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक
1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 09-09-2021 थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 14-09-2021 जांच आख्या संलग्न है । C-श्रेणीकरण
2 आख्या वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक , मिर्ज़ापुर 21-09-2021 कृपया आवश्यक कार्यवाही करते हुए गुणवत्तापूर्ण जाँच आख्या अन्दर 07 दिवस प्रेषित करे। थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 25-09-2021 आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है।
अनुमोदन टिप्पणी :--- महोदय जाँच रिपोर्ट सादर सेवा में अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित।'
दिंनाक - 26-09-2021 श्रेणीकृत निस्तारित

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60029
Name Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Filing 03/08/2021

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 03/08/2021
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454401105
Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60029

Date of Filing 03/08/2021
* Name Sudarshan Maurya
Gender Male
* Address Sohta Ka Adda , Jungi Road, Mirzapur city
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number 91-9455024500
Mobile Number +91-9455024500
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought To create undue pressure on the applicant,  chauki in-charge Mandi samiti fabricated charges under criminal penal code 107/116 quite obvious from the third page of the attached document. It is most surprising that whenever anyone seeks justice in the department of police then from that person there is apprehension of breach of peace in the society and police imposes on them section of criminal panel code 107/116.This implies that to register FIR in the department of police, one May be ready to get registered a case under Cr.P.C. 107 /116 on itself.

1-Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to fabricate information seeker under Cr.P.C. 107 /116. 

Please take a glance of first page of attached PDF which is report submitted by the  chauki in-charge Mandi samiti in the following complaint on the Jansunwai portal. 

Please check it whether report is relevant to submissions of the complaint. संदर्भ संख्या : 40019921013754 , दिनांक - 02 Aug 2021 तक की स्थिति आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-40019921013754आवेदक का नाम-Sudarshan Mauryaविषय-श्री मान जी जैसा की आप को पूर्व में विदित है विपक्षी याकूब अंसारी द्वारा प्रार्थी के विरुद्ध शिकायती पत्र प्रस्तुत किया गया की प्रार्थी द्वारा उसके मकान  बनाने के सामान को जबरदस्ती रख लिया गया है किन्तु सच यह है की सामान याकूब अंसारी द्वारा खुद नहीं ले जाया जा रहा है श्री मान जी प्रार्थी द्वारा याकूब अंसारी से पंजीकृत पत्र  द्वारा अनुरोध किया गया किन्तु वे अभी तक अपना सामान नहीं ले गए  For more detail, vide attached document

2-Please provide the reason, if Yakoob Ansari is not interested to take back the articles used for construction of houses, then why, concerned police did not take articles in its own custody as requested. 

3-Please provide the progress report in the matter as chauki in charge requested city magistrate to appoint technical expert to ascertain the loss occurred to information seeker because dereliction of accused contractor. 

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2021/60018 
Name Sudarshan Maurya 
Date of Filing 16/09/2021 
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 16/09/2021 
 Nodal Officer Details 
 Telephone Number 9454401105 
Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-  
* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60029
Request Registration Date 03/08/2021
* Name Sudarshan Maurya
Gender Male
* Address Sohta Ka Adda , Jungi Road, Mirzapur city
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number -9455024500
Mobile Number +91-9455024500
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number- SPMZR/R/2021/60029 Name- Sudarshan Maurya Date of Filing- 03-08-2021 Detail is attached to the appeal in the PDF form. According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005-Subject to the proviso to subsection (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9:It is 16 Sept 2021 today which means 1 month 14 days passed, but PIO did not provide any information which means PIO denied information as quite obvious from the subsection 2 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under subsection (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request.  Consequently, PIO violated subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Circular dated 09 Sept 2021 to curb misuse of section 107/116/151 in the sequence of the directives High court of judicature at Allahabad is the first page of the attached document. Undoubtedly sought information was denied by the public information officer in the office of superintendent of police Mirzapur because supervisory bodies are in good faith of the subordinates quite obvious from the circular issued by the government and worries of the high court regarding misuse of provisions of Cr. P.C. by the police personnel. 
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. Information sought under three points but not a single point information was made available by information seeker.
    Please provide the reason, if Yakoob Ansari is not interested to take back the articles used for construction of houses, then why, concerned police did not take articles in its own custody as requested.

    Please provide the progress report in the matter as chauki in charge requested city magistrate to appoint technical expert to ascertain the loss occurred to information seeker because dereliction of accused contractor.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post