Allegations of Rs.50 thousand bribe was not looked into but wrongdoers were set scot-free reflects deep rooted corruption DPRO, D.M. CDO
Registration Number DPTPR/R/2020/80042
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 26/02/2020
Status RTI REQUEST APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on 19/03/2020
Remarks :- RTI online application will not be transferred under section 6(3)of the RTI act to such public authority where RTI ONLINE facility is not live (available). It is advisable to file RTI Application in Physical Form (Hard Copy) to such Public Authorities that are not listed under RTI ONLINE facility.
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 05222213081
Email-ID panchyatiraj1@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Panchayati Raj Department
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DPTPR/R/2020/80042
Date of Filing 26/02/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought
The matter is concerned with village panchayat -Neebi Gaharwar, Development block-Chhanbey, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
1-Provide reason to remain three successive five-year term unreserved of the aforementioned gram panchayat pradhan post.
2-Provide reason of never reserving pradhan post for backward caste when cyclic order reservation is enforced.
3-Provide measures taken by the state election commission to curb rampant corruption in the reservation process of pradhan post.
* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number DPTPR/A/2021/60262
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 12-11-2021
Request filed with Panchayati Raj Department
Contact Details
Telephone Number 05222213081
Email-ID panchyatiraj1@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Panchayati Raj Department
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DPTPR/R/2020/80042
Request Registration Date 26/02/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought RTI online application will not be transferred under section 6(3)of the RTI act to such public authority where RTI ONLINE facility is not live (available). It is advisable to file RTI Application in Physical Form (Hard Copy) to such Public Authorities that are not listed under RTI ONLINE facility. Aforementioned is cryptic denial of sought information and reflects rampant corruption in the government machinery must be stopped. Now most of the public authorities are available online so communique must be forwarded to concerned mandate.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
PLEASE direct concerned to pursue the law of land instead of making mockery of it.
4 messages
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 18 December 2016 at 11:27
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, secy-cic@nic.in
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, "csup@up.nic.in" <csup@up.nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com
An application under article 32 of constitution of India .
18 December 2016
10:18
To
Hon'ble chief justice of India
Supreme court , New Delhi ,India
Subject-Order passed by Registrar judicial on 20-11-2015 is ultravires to constitution of India and gross injustice with the thousands of people belonging to poor and downtrodden section.
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon'ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that it is quite true that enquiry was conducted by district level officers i.e. Joint team of Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and project director and bungling of public fund was proved and recovery more than Lakhs of rupees was recommended by enquiry team but senior rank officers like D. M. Mirzapur ,DPRO and CDO overlooked the enquiry report which was mockery of law of land and most surprising still government of Uttar Pradesh didn't recover recommended amount bungled by wrongdoers .
2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whatever grounds were supporting the PIL were kept before accountable public functionaries as negative points of PIL CAUSED the great damage to constitutional and civil rights of poor villagers. Whether such cryptic behaviour of staffs of registry of apex court of India is justified. Whether such steps are not promoting anarchy in our society. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that according to concerned staffs when apex court didn't entertain the PIL ,then how the action taken and copy of order be provided but the fate of my PIL addressed to chief justice of India has been decided by the staffs of registry of Apex court of India so copy of order passed by registrar judicial be made available to your applicant so that your applicant may challenge the impugned order passed by Registrar judicial. By not providing the order of REGISTRAR JUDICIAL , CPIO Apex court of India not only violated the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 but also breached the appellate rights of your applicant consequently deprived thousands of poor villagers from right to justice. What reflects the non recovery of siphoned amount from wrongdoers by the Government of Uttar Pradesh? Even common man can understand it that wrongdoers are acting in caucus with each other and their syndicate is influential.
4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that if the order of recovery recommended against wrongdoers , then it must be pursued accordingly unless otherwise order passed by the competent authority. But here no rule of law and final reply of B.D.O. Chhanbey ,Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh is one of the attached documents which is so implicit , illegible and misleading that it can be seen by those privileged people having special powers of perception specially bestowed by GOD TO public functionaries working in government of Uttar Pradesh.
5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that ipso facto obvious that matter is concerned with the rampant corruption in the system quite obvious from the attached documents with this representation but more ridiculous is that registrar judicial don't think it fit to be considered as public interest litigation. Undoubtedly to ignore wrongdoers and their wrongdoing is tantamount to promote them and set up bad example/precedents for future generation.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.
Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India
Recovery as recommended by E.O.s was not made is mockery of law of land..pdf
824K
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 26 March 2017 at 10:43
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, "csup@up.nic.in" <csup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in
Hon'ble Sir -This representation may not be considered as reminder in regard to following
Status of Letter Petition
Diary Number 2171 / 2017
Application Date 18/12/2016
Received On 14/01/2017
Applicant Name YOGI M P SINGH
Address MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM JABALPUR ROAD DISTRICT MIRZAPUR
State UTTAR PRADESH
Action Taken UNDER PROCESS
Supreme Court of India
but for those who always mislead the citizenry through their false press notes.
|
|
Here this question arises that when your applicant ran from top to bottom, but no recovery could be. feasible after the recommendation of two district level officers who were nominated enquiry officers by D.M. itself, then how action can be taken against gram pradhans on such flimsy grounds. [Quoted text hidden] Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 5 May 2017 at 03:13 To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in> Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in> शिकायत संख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
How much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded under the nose of accountable public functionaries ? Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed to your applicant is sheer illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,mockery of law of land and ultravires to constitution if accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in the system and will set up bad precedent for future generation. With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is itself a wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in siphoning the public fund. Hon'ble Sir please take a glance of first second and third page of attached documents which are reports of joint team of E.Os. nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level officers Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and Project director. They have evidently recommended Rs. 1 Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 .
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned recommendation was made on 28-July-2015 .
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 3 in the enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that complaint regarding the plantation and pond couldn't be looked into because concerned didn't provide the records so enquiry couldn't be carried out consequently sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the ground of merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about the report.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that page four is the communication dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is enquiry report carried out by wrongdoers themselves who are proved guilty in the report of team nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur as aforementioned.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between 28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five days. Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his working style from existing circumstancial evidences.
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant motive was to implement the recommendation of enquiry officer nominated by district magistrate through enquiry so that public exchequer be benefitted but motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto obvious that he wanted to shield his wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to achieve its ulterior motives.
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
119. The Apex Court held that if the basic order stands vitiated, the consequential order automatically falls." In another case of Chunmun Vs. District Magistrate, Sonbhadra and others; 1998 (89) Revenue Digest 771, this Court has clearly held that the cessation of the financial and administrative powers of a Pradhan on the basis of report submitted by an officer/public servant who is not defined as an Enquiry Officer under Rule 2(c) cannot be the basis for exercise of power under Rule 5. Reliance has been placed by Sri Hemant Kumar Misra, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 7 on a Single Judge decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Malti Devi Vs. State of U.P. and others; 2008 (1) CRC 714. This case Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) is of no avail and is of no relevance at all in as much as that in this case the District Magistrate had appointed the District Basic Education Officer to hold a preliminary enquiry and undisputedly, District Basic Education Officer is a District level officer and, therefore, being a district level officer and having been nominated by the District Magistrate for holding the preliminary enquiry fully fall within the meaning of Enquiry Officer as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Enquiry Rules. In the case in hand there was no appointment of the Enquiry Officer by the District Magistrate and two members of the Enquiry Committee appointed by the Chief Development Officer who is not competent to appoint Enquiry Officer under 1997 Enquiry Rules, could not at all act as Enquiry Officer and any report with their participation in the Enquiry could not be taken as an Enquiry Report under Rule 4. Therefore, the case of Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) had no relevance or any bearing at all so far as the present case is concerned. Whether staffs of B.D.O. who are itself proved guilty in the enquiry report carried out under Panchaayti Raj Act can supersede the enquiry report by misinterpreting earlier report. Whether D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is a layman who is not apprised with the fact that pricipal of natural justice never allowes a wrongdoer to carry out enquiry in order to prove itself innocent. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur set wrongdoers scot free by making the mockery of law of land. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is guilty of misinterpreting the enquiry report through wrongdoer subordinates of B.D.O. Chhanbey. This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon'ble Sir.
Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
On 18 December 2016 at 11:27, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote: [Quoted text hidden]
Recovery recommended by E.O. illegally withheld by DPRO Mirzapur.pdf 469K Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 September 2018 at 22:46 To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in> Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in> Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, csup@up.nic.in To Hon'ble chief justice of India New Delhi, India Subject- Bogus enquiry made by the wrongdoers in order to shield themselves upheld by the D.M. Mirzapur itself which is a mockery of law of land and creating insecurity in the mind of the citizenry and credibility of institutions have reached the nadir. With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon'ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that please take a glance of following enquiry report which was challenged by your applicant-
2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that on the ground of aforementioned report, recovery order of Rs.1 Lakh 5 thousand approximate and others made to the wrongdoers including panchayat secretary Jitendra Singh who is one of the team members of the aforementioned team has been waved off. Recovery order was proposed by the joint team of two district-level officers 1-Enquiry officer nominated by the D. M. Mirzapur i.e. Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur. 3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that deputy commissioner work and employment had also been granted the charge of B.D.O. Chhanbey arbitrarily carried out enquiry through its subordinates in order to shield its corrupt coterie. In order to shield its skin this deputy commissioner and working B.D.O. Chhanbey made the mockery of the panchayat Raj ACT and ordered enquiry and superseded enquiry made by the senior rank officers Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur carried out under panchayat raj act. 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Hon'ble Sir please take a glance at the following grievance submitted by the applicant on the public grievance portal of government of India. Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2018/05077
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-29/05/2018
Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
Grievance Document
Current Status-Case closed
Date of Action-31/08/2018
Remarks

 
 ,
 
 ,ok
 ,
 shikayt krta dwara purv mai shikayt kiya gya tha jiski janch diya gya hai
Reply Document, Officer Concerns To
Officer Name-Shri Kalyan Banerji, Officer Designation-Under Secretary
Contact Address-Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address, Contact Number-05222215127
Pasted from <https://pgportal.gov.in/Status/Detail/R09WVVAvRS8yMDE4LzA1MDc3>
5-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that how the principle of natural justice allow a junior officer to order an enquiry against the proposed recovery order made by the senior rank officers and most surprising that genuine enquiry under panchayat raj act was nullified by the team of subordinates of block development officer Chhanbey.
6-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that when your applicant challenged the validity of the aforementioned Bogus report, then how D.M. Mirzapur can take the recourse of the aforementioned report to close the grievance? Whether it is not a reflection of rampant corruption that the act made the mockery of the law of land was made ground to close the case without attending in a genuine way. Please take a glance of attached documents submitted with the grievance in order to seek justice from the chief minister office government of Uttar Pradesh.
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir. Yours sincerely Date-07-09-2018 Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
[Quoted text hidden]
3 attachments img076.jpg 2108K img077.jpg 2292K grievanceDocument.pdf 2646K |
|
Hon'ble Sir that it is quite true that enquiry was conducted by district level officers i.e. Joint team of Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and project director and bungling of public fund was proved and recovery more than Lakhs of rupees was recommended by enquiry team but senior rank officers like D. M. Mirzapur ,DPRO and CDO overlooked the enquiry report which was mockery of law of land and most surprising still government of Uttar Pradesh didn't recover recommended amount bungled by wrongdoers .
ReplyDelete