Applicant sought information concerns action taken by D.M. Ayodhya on complaints sent on his executive email but denied illegally
How the following information can be denied as closely connected with the working of district magistrate Ayodhya
Applicant submitted email representation dated 18 June 2021 before various accountable public functionaries of this country, including district magistrate.
Since the matter is closely connected with the working of district magistrate Ayodhya, so please provide the following information.
1-Aforementioned representation sent to D.M. Ayodhya is also attached to this representation, Please provide the action taken in the matter if any on the part of district administration.
2-If D.M. did not deem fit to take any action, then provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
3-If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
Section 9 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
Grounds for rejection to access in certain cases.
Without prejudice to the provisions of section 8, a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may reject a request for information where such a request for providing access would involve an infringement of copyright subsisting in a person other than the State.
Registration Number DMOAD/A/2021/60044
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/08/2021
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 22/09/2021
Reply :- अपर जिलाधिकारी का0व्यव, अयोध्या से जनसूचना प्राप्त की गयी। जनसूचना संलग्न है।
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Request Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Request Registration Date 19/06/2021
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number -7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
PIO of Public Authority approached ADM LO Jag Prasad Singh
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
Prayer or Relief Sought According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 -Public Information Officer has to provide the sought information within 30 days from the date R.T.I. request is received in the office of the public authority. Here stipulated 30 days to provide information to information seeker passed as RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 19/06/2021 and today is 23/08/2021 which categorically shows that public information officer in the office district Ayodhya violated the aforementioned section of the Right to Information Act 2005. Undoubtedly it is mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. I think that district magistrate must provide following information if he has taken any action against those collecting donations from public and misusing. The matter concerns the high profile corruption and wide public interest. They have broken the sentiments of the people. The piece of land in Ayodhya is registered with number 243, 244 and 246. Its value is Rs 5.80 crore. It was purchased from Kusum Pathak and Harish Pathak by Sultan Ansari and Ravi Mohan Tiwari for Rs 2 crore. The purchase had two witnesses — Anil Mishra, a member of the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust, and Rishikesh Upadhyay, who is the Mayor of Ayodhya. It was purchased at 7.10 pm. In the next five minutes, the same land was bought by Ram Janmabhoomi Trust and Champat Rai for Rs 18.5 crore from Ansari and Tiwari. Rs 17 crore was transferred through RTGS
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 07/09/2021
Reason for Rejection :- Section 9.
Remarks:-
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
Description of Information Sought Applicant submitted email representation dated 18 June 2021 before various accountable public functionaries of this country, including district magistrate.
Since the matter is closely connected with the working of district magistrate Ayodhya, so please provide the following information.
1-Aforementioned representation sent to D.M. Ayodhya is also attached to this representation, Please provide the action taken in the matter if any on the part of district administration.
2-If D.M. did not deem fit to take any action, then provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
3-If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
Concerned PIO ADM LO Jag Prasad Singh
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
ReplyDeleteD.M. ran away from providing information which implies that he overlooks entire complaints from public received on his executive email.