Appeal submitted as D.M. Ayodhya did not provide information concerns anomalies in purchase of land for construction of Ram temple
Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number DMOAD/A/2021/60044
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23-08-2021
Request filed with DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Contact Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID admefaizabad@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Request Registration Date 19/06/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number -7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought According to subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 -Public Information Officer has to provide the sought information within 30 days from the date R.T.I. request is received in the office of the public authority. Here stipulated 30 days to provide information to information seeker passed as RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 19/06/2021 and today is 23/08/2021 which categorically shows that public information officer in the office district Ayodhya violated the aforementioned section of the Right to Information Act 2005. Undoubtedly it is mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. I think that district magistrate must provide following information if he has taken any action against those collecting donations from public and misusing. The matter concerns the high profile corruption and wide public interest. They have broken the sentiments of the people. The piece of land in Ayodhya is registered with number 243, 244 and 246. Its value is Rs 5.80 crore. It was purchased from Kusum Pathak and Harish Pathak by Sultan Ansari and Ravi Mohan Tiwari for Rs 2 crore. The purchase had two witnesses — Anil Mishra, a member of the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust, and Rishikesh Upadhyay, who is the Mayor of Ayodhya. It was purchased at 7.10 pm. In the next five minutes, the same land was bought by Ram Janmabhoomi Trust and Champat Rai for Rs 18.5 crore from Ansari and Tiwari. Rs 17 crore was transferred through RTGS
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DMOAD/A/2021/60044
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/08/2021
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 23/08/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID admefaizabad@gmail.com
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 19/06/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID admefaizabad@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Applicant submitted email representation dated 18 June 2021 before various accountable public functionaries of this country, including district magistrate.
Since the matter is closely connected with the working of district magistrate Ayodhya, so please provide the following information.
1-Aforementioned representation sent to D.M. Ayodhya is also attached to this representation, Please provide the action taken in the matter if any on the part of district administration.
2-If D.M. did not deem fit to take any action, then provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
3-If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
This was expressed by Butiful images
ReplyDelete20 June 2021 at 08:17
I don't think that they will take this application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of right to information act 2005 by the public spirited person Yogi M. P. Singh will take seriously because they know that if they will provide information in the public domain they will be exposed and it is quite obvious from the post that land of price value of 2 crore was purchased in 18.5 crore rupees and even then registry was not executed by the concerned public authorities which reflects the deep rooted corruption in the donations taken by the RAM temple construction trust having patronage of the ruling party.
Think about the gravity of situation that in the name of construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya saffron brigade is seeking donations since the year 1986 when Bhartiya Janata party and its sister concerns initiated campaign to make the Ram temple at the birthplace of RAM in Ayodhya. Consequently they collected huge fund and where is going these funds no one knows and this matter is of the national interest or National issue which resulted huge loss to this country reaping benefits of this issue a particular outfit of this country.