R.T.I. Communique of Sarita Singh forwarded to D.G.P. by chief minister office of Government of U.P. after first appeal of appellant
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
RTI Online - Request Transferred To Other Public Authority 1 message |
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60294
Name Sarita Singh
Date of Filing 07/04/2021
Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as on 14/07/2021
Details of Public Autority :- Director General of Police Office.
vide registration number :- DGPOF/R/2021/80172 respectively.
Note:- Further details will be available on viewing the status of the above-mentioned new request registration number.
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454412725
Email-ID sunil.12725@gov.in
Registration Number DGPOF/R/2021/80172
Name Sarita Singh
Date of Filing 14/07/2021
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 14/07/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454405121
Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60294
Date of Filing 07/04/2021
* Name Sarita Singh
Gender Female
* Address Flat number 11 , Jail Road Shivpur
Pincode 221010
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number +91-7309711847
Mobile Number +91-7309711847
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2021/0187654 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Sarita Singh Date of Receipt 13/03/2021 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers Office Current Status Under process Date of Action 18/03/2021Remarks Grievance received by Subordinate Organization from Web API, Detail of F.I.R. lodged in Lanka police station District Varanasi is attached to communique.
1-Please provide the notings in regard to aforementioned grievance.
2- Please provide the action in the matter concerned.
3-Two sections of the IPC is imposed on accused Hritik Ranjan section 376 and 406 of the IPC as he and his family is not cooperating enquiry and not appearing before competent officers so need to take vigilant eyes on them.
Please provide the information regarding the non arrest of accused Hritik Ranjan.
4-Undoubtedly it may be Lanka police may not have sent the requisite information but when concerned officers have sought information from aggrieved then it is their obligation to take him under custody but Hritik Ranjan still hatches conspiracy against the information seeker knowingly not supporting Lanka police in the investigation. Please provide the reason for not arresting the accused.
* Concerned PIO RAM JIYAWAN (L.S. Sec-1)
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DOCMO/A/2021/60131
Name Sarita Singh
Date of Filing 17/06/2021
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 22/06/2021
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 9454412777, Email Id:- ajay.12777@gov.in
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454412725
Email-ID sunil.12725@gov.in
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60294
Request Registration Date 07/04/2021
* Name Sarita Singh
Gender Male
* Address Flat number 11 , Jail Road Shivpur
Pincode 221010
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number -7309711847
Mobile Number +91-7309711847
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Any Other ground
* PIO of Public Authority approached RAM JIYAWAN (L.S. Sec-1)
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Mr. First Appellate Authority, appellant submitted R.T.I. Communique on 07/04/2021 and it was forwarded to public information officer on 08/04/2021 and today is 17/06/2021 which implies that public information officer in the chief minister office violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which stipulates 30 days to provide information to the information seeker from the date of receipt of the R.T.I. Communique in the office of the public authority. It is quite obvious that Public Information Officer took under teeth the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 because he has no regard for transparency act as it is against the corruption prevailing in our government machinery like jungle fire. Here matter concerns with the serious irregularities committed by the Varanasi police concerned because of corruption, so chief minister office is adopting lackadaisical approach in the matter. The matter concerns with the cheating and rape with the unmarried girl and opposition party by colluding with the police concerned who misused his post blatantly by undermining the authority of the senior rank officers before whom representations of appellant is pending. Please take appropriate action, so the wrongdoers may be subjected to penal proceeding as required under the law of land. Please take appropriate action against PIO not acting according to provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 and supporting wrongdoer police officers who are promoting anarchy.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
It is quite obvious that Public Information Officer took under teeth the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 because he has no regard for transparency act as it is against the corruption prevailing in our government machinery like jungle fire. Here matter concerns with the serious irregularities committed by the Varanasi police concerned because of corruption, so chief minister office is adopting lackadaisical approach in the matter.
ReplyDeleteUnder subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005 an application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of right to information act 2005 is transferred to the other public authorities within 5 days from the date of receipt of the the application in the office of public authority.
ReplyDeleteHere public information officer in the office of chief minister Uttar Pradesh made the mockery of the provisions of the right to information act 2005 by making undue delay of more than three months in forwarding the communique under subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005.
This question arises that whether they will provide information after the matter forwarded by the chief minister office to the director general of police who is the administrative head of the police department.
ReplyDeleteEveryone knows that they are adopting lackadaisical approach in the matter because of the corruption in the department and if the matter forwarded by the chief minister office it does not mean that it will create pressure on them. These people are selfish limitless.
Right to Information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to curb corruption in the public offices which was growing like Jungle fire in the government machinery but it is unfortunate that this corruption overshadowed The provisions of Right to Information act 2005 which is the failure of the the government machinery and Showing that there is rampant corruption in the public offices in this largest democracy in the world.
ReplyDeleteThere must be transparency and accountability in the dealings of the police otherwise how the justice would be available to the the women and girls in this largest populous state in this largest democracy in the world.
ReplyDeleteIf the rights of the women are suppressed in the most VIP constituency of the prime minister sir then think about the remote villages and in the state of Uttar Pradesh.