Information sought from D.M. Ayodhya regarding the anomaly in collection of donations and its use for the construction of Ram temple
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 19/06/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID admefaizabad@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Date of Filing 19/06/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Applicant submitted email representation dated 18 June 2021 before various accountable public functionaries of this country, including district magistrate. Since the matter is closely connected with the working of district magistrate Ayodhya, so please provide the following information.
1-Aforementioned representation sent to D.M. Ayodhya is also attached to this representation, Please provide the action taken in the matter if any on the part of district administration.
2-If D.M. did not deem fit to take any action, then provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
3-If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DMOAD/R/2021/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 19-06-2021
RTI Fee Received 10
Online Reference Number IK0BDHZEI2
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE AYODHYA
Contact Details of Nodal Officer
Telephone Number 9454416101
Email-ID admefaizabad@gmail.com
Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
An enquiry under the monitoring of apex court may be ordered by the apex court of India regarding the collections of donations and its misuse.
1 message
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 1:28 PM
To: commfai@nic.in, dmfai@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko@yahoo.co.in
A petition under Article 32 of the constitution of India to seek investigation by the premier investigation agency central bureau of investigation which may be carried out under the monitoring of Apex court.
Undoubtedly the matter of construction of Lord Ram temple at Ayodhya after the landmark judgement of the Apex court of India is a national issue not the state matter so need of hour invites the interference of apex court if an outfit is playing with emotions of a large section of people. An enquiry under the monitoring of apex court may be ordered by the apex court of India regarding the collections of donations and its misuse in the name of construction of Ram temple.
To
Honourable Chief Justice of India / Companion Judges of the Apex Court
Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Prayer-Please pass an appropriate order so that misuse of the name of Lord Ram by a particular outfit for individual gains may stop and huge donations collected by the volunteers of the ruling party both at the state and in centre may be checked in a transparent and accountable manner consequently misuse of donations of citizens of this country and misleading of innocent and gullible citizenry may be controlled.
Most revered Sir–Your applicant invites the kind attention of Honorable Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-I pray before the Honourable Sir that Hon'ble Sir may take a glance of the news story published in the Indian Express English daily with title as
Amid fraud allegations, Ram temple Trust releases purchase details of Ayodhya land deal
By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
Updated: June 15, 2021 4:21:44 pm
Allegations by public spirited people as follows
“The piece of land in Ayodhya is registered with number 243, 244 and 246. Its value is Rs 5.80 crore. It was purchased from Kusum Pathak and Harish Pathak by Sultan Ansari and Ravi Mohan Tiwari for Rs 2 crore. The purchase had two witnesses — Anil Mishra, a member of the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust, and Rishikesh Upadhyay, who is the Mayor of Ayodhya. It was purchased at 7.10 pm. In the next five minutes, the same land was bought by Ram Janmabhoomi Trust and Champat Rai for Rs 18.5 crore from Ansari and Tiwari. Rs 17 crore was transferred through RTGS.”
Explanation of the Ram temple Trust is as follows.
Outlining the detailed history of agreements on the land deal, the Trust stated that on March 18, Ravi Mohan Tiwari and Sultan Ansari had bought the land registered with numbers 243, 244 and 246 by a sale deed for an amount of Rs 2 crore, with “valuation at circle rate Rs 5.80 crores and stamp for Rs 5.80 crores Valuation”. The statement added that Tiwari and Ansari entered into an agreement on the same day to sell this land to the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust. “Consideration amount agreed was Rs. 18.50 crores. Payment of Rs. 17 crores was made as advance by online transaction,” it further stated.
The temple Trust has also said that the land is situated at a “prime” location and the price at which it was bought was “much less than the actual market rate in Ayodhya”.
The statement comes at a time when there have been widespread allegations of corruption in connection with the Ayodhya land deal and claims that Shriram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust general secretary Champat Rai had bought the piece of land at an inflated price.
3-I pray before the Honourable Sir that whether in this short explanation of Ram temple trust it was explained properly why the Rs.17 crore was transferred through RTGS out of 18.5 crore for the land valued Rs. 2crore ipso facto? Whether the initial offered price for an agreement of land is multi times greater than the actual price of the land?
4-I pray before the Honourable Sir that this news widely circulated in our country through print and electronic media of this country and media made it prime item as matter concerns with the mockery of the emotions of the large section of the people and their donations therefore it invites apex court as apex can not keep itself aloof from the controversy infringing the interests of large scale common people who were pressed psychologically to give donation for the construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya.
5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that this donation for the construction of Ram temple is being collected since the date chariot journey was started by the Vishw Hindu Parishad and Bajarang Dal for the construction of Ram temple in 1986 by igniting communal struggle in this country by disturbing the peace and tranquility of the nation resulting heavy loss to country.
खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |
इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||
This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-18/06/2021 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi |
ReplyDeleteUpdated: June 15, 2021 4:21:44 pm
Allegations by public spirited people as follows
“The piece of land in Ayodhya is registered with number 243, 244 and 246. Its value is Rs 5.80 crore. It was purchased from Kusum Pathak and Harish Pathak by Sultan Ansari and Ravi Mohan Tiwari for Rs 2 crore. The purchase had two witnesses — Anil Mishra, a member of the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust, and Rishikesh Upadhyay, who is the Mayor of Ayodhya. It was purchased at 7.10 pm. In the next five minutes, the same land was bought by Ram Janmabhoomi Trust and Champat Rai for Rs 18.5 crore from Ansari and Tiwari. Rs 17 crore was transferred through RTGS.”
I think that district magistrate must provide following information if he has taken any action against those collecting donations from public and misusing.
ReplyDelete1-Aforementioned representation sent to D.M. Ayodhya is also attached to this representation, Please provide the action taken in the matter if any on the part of district administration.
2-If D.M. did not deem fit to take any action, then provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
3-If D.M. Ayodhya takes action any action on the representations of aggrieved people received on the executive email of D.M. , then provide how many emails received and action taken on the number of emails by District Magistrate during last month and this month.
Undoubtedly right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India during the regime of Congress to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but this august act is being diluted day by day by the Modi Government and in the state by the Yogi Adityanath government. Now this condition has arisen that not a single information is being provided by the public information officers in the state of Uttar Pradesh because of rampant corruption in the state.
ReplyDeleteOur motive is good governance but where is good governance if there is no transparency and accountability in the working of the public functionaries and what ever statements are circulated from the key officers that is only a showpiece nothing concrete.
I don't think that they will take this application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of right to information act 2005 by the public spirited person Yogi M. P. Singh will take seriously because they know that if they will provide information in the public domain they will be exposed and it is quite obvious from the post that land of price value of 2 crore was purchased in 18.5 crore rupees and even then registry was not executed by the concerned public authorities which reflects the deep rooted corruption in the donations taken by the RAM temple construction trust having patronage of the ruling party.
ReplyDeleteThink about the gravity of situation that in the name of construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya saffron brigade is seeking donations since the year 1986 when Bhartiya Janata party and its sister concerns initiated campaign to make the Ram temple at the birthplace of RAM in Ayodhya. Consequently they collected huge fund and where is going these funds no one knows and this matter is of the national interest or National issue which resulted huge loss to this country reaping benefits of this issue a particular outfit of this country.