CPIO Bank of Baroda directed by First Appellate Authority to provide information withheld by him arbitrarily
Enter Registration Number BKOBD/A/E/21/00186 Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 21/04/2021 Public Authority Bank of Baroda Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF
Date of action 19/05/2021 Reply :- Order Attached View Document
First Appellate Authority Details :- P Srinivasa Reddy (HO) Phone: 0265-2316792
gm.ops.ho@bankofbaroda.com Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 02266985881 Email Id dgm[dot]pio[at]bankofbaroda[dot]com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
RTI Appeal Details :-
RTI Appeal Registration number BKOBD/A/E/21/00186
Public Authority Bank of Baroda
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number BKOBD/R/E/20/01011
Request Registration Date 07/06/2020
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information
CPIO of Public Authority approached T C Thakur (CPPC)
CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided
CPIO's Order/Decision Date
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Prayer or Relief Sought
Herewith appeal submitted at the email of the First Appellate Authority is attached.1-Where are notings.
2-Where is the name and designation of the staffs who processed pension.
3-Third point is misleading as pension is not being provided ipso facto delay was made but cause of delay was not made available.
If the delay was made at the level of branch, then R.T.I. communique had to be forwarded to the branch concerned under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
Appeal of Mr. Yogi M P Singh
Inbox
LEGAL HEAD OFFICE <LEGAL.HEADOFFICE@bankofbaroda.com>
Attachments
21 May 2021, 16:40 (2 days ago)
to m
Dear Sir,
This has reference to the Order of Chief General Manager (Operations) and In-charge First Appellate Authority vide letter no. HO:LEGAL:113:GM:APPEAL:10/38 dated 19.05.2021 in the your captioned Appeal Bearing Registration no. BKOBD/A/E/00186 dated 21.04.2021.
Kindly find the order for your information and ignore the typographical error.
With regards,
Legal Department
Head Office
Baroda
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Why the pension of widow of Late Army personnel was arbitrarily withheld by the concerned branch manager?
3 messages
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 21 April 2021 at 01:03
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cm.cppc@bankofbaroda.com, dgm.pio@bankofbaroda.com, pmo.applications@gov.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, gm.ops.ho@bankofbroda.com, cppc.delhi@bankofbaroda.com, cda-albd@nic.in, gm.ops.ho@bankofbaroda.com
Whether it is not mismanagement and anarchy depriving widow of defence personnel from family pension?
Widow of Defence personnel was called on three times on the Talai Bazar Branch of Bank of Baroda and revered lady travelled three times from Feb to June from Sultanpur to Tilai Bazar District-Allahabad to verify documents but it is unfortunate that requisite documents still not reached to the central pension processing centre. Whether it is not corruption?
Undoubtedly our media is playing the same role as Charan and Bhat were playing during the medieval history period. These Charan and Bhat used to glorify its kings falsely which resulted in the entire territory gone into the possession of foreign invaders and innocent people faced atrocity of foreign invaders. Here in this country, there is complete lawlessness, anarchy, arbitrariness and mismanagement which is being glorified by the cunning media.
To The Chief Manager
Bank of Baroda
Central Processing Centre (CPPC)
Baroda Global Shared Services (BGSS)
RLBO, 21st Floor, Gift One Tower
Gift City, Gandhinagar
Gujarat - 382355
Phone : 079-66734706, 66734638,
Subject-Eight months passed since the date of death of the revered husband, but not a single coin was transferred to the account of revered lady Uma Singh.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the submitted R.T.I. Communique by the applicant.
Enter Registration Number BKOBD/R/E/20/01011
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 07/06/2020 Public Authority Bank of Baroda
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF Date of action 23/06/2020
Reply :- yes View Document
CPIO Details :- T C Thakur (CPPC) Phone: 07966734778
cm.cppc@bankofbaroda.com
First Appellate Authority Details :- P Srinivasa Reddy (HO)
Phone: 0265-2316792 gm.ops.ho@bankofbaroda.com
Nodal Officer Details :- Telephone Number 02266985881
Email Id dgm[dot]pio[at]bankofbaroda[dot]com
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following information sought by the information seeker as follows.
Defence principal account controller, pay, through its letter dated-07-02-2020 attached as the first page of PDF document to this R.T.I. Communique addressed to the chief manager, Bank of Baroda.
Please provide the following information in regard to the aforementioned communication, as sought.
1-Notings and minutes of proceedings.
2-Name and designation of staffs who processed.
3-Cause of undue delay and time if any more to commence the pension.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from the status of the submitted R.T.I. communique under point 2, CPIO disposed of it on 23/06/2020 through the report dated 20/06/2020 as page 2 of the attached PDF document which provides information as follows.
1-List of documents received from the branch on 19/06/2020 and after verification family pension processed.
2-Due monthly pension has been processed in the system.
3-Your life certificate has been updated in the system on 20/06/2020 by the branch and the pension will be credited in the next pension processing. Hence there is no delay at the CPPC level.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to the first page of the attached PDF document Life Certificated is submitted by the pensioner once a year.
1-Where are notings.
2-Where is the name and designation of the staffs who processed pension.
3-Third point is misleading as pension is not being provided ipso facto delay was made but cause of delay was not made available.
If the delay was made at the level of branch, then R.T.I. communique had to be forwarded to the branch concerned under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |
इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-21/04/2021 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh,
Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur
Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Why did the CPIO not provide information under Right to Information Act 2005? Undoubtedly they took provisions of the act under teeth.
ReplyDelete1-Where are notings.
2-Where is the name and designation of the staffs who processed pension.
3-Third point is misleading as pension is not being provided ipso facto delay was made but cause of delay was not made available.
If the delay was made at the level of branch, then R.T.I. communique had to be forwarded to the branch concerned under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
It is a fact that they are running away from providing information which is quite obvious from the order passed by the first appellate authority of the public authority as he is well apprised with the fact that they did not provide the information. Everyone knows that mistakes of the fact is excusable but mistakes of the law is unpardonable.
ReplyDeleteRight to Information Act 2005 introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority. In the regime of B.J.P. Led central government made it teeth less which resulted in non supply of information under Right to Information Act 2005 ipso facto obvious from procrastination and apathy of concerned central public information officers.
ReplyDeleteBecause of rampant corruption in the government, Right to Information Act 2005 introduced to promote transparency and accountability in the government machinery undoubtedly in the dilapidated state because apathy of our prime minister Mr. Narendra Damodar Modi. In the eight years of its tenure Modi Government and other B.J.P. ruled states only diluted the provisions of the August act to pave the way to the corruption.
ReplyDelete