Why Government of Uttar Pradesh is failed in the recovery of penalties imposed by UPSIC?


Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Why D.M. Mirzapur did not take any action on the communication dated 01/12/2020 of Tejaskar Pandey, PIO, UPSIC?
1 message

Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:50 PM
To: satyendra.13939@gov.in, dmmir@up.nic.in, commmir@nic.in, sec.sic@up.nic.in, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com
श्री मान जी जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर पिछले तीन वर्षो से टाल  मटोल कर रहे है किन्तु अभी तक चारो जनसूचना अधिकारियों से राज्य सूचना आयोग द्वारा अधिरोपित शास्ति की वसूली नहीं की गयी 
मै  मानता हूँ की राज्य में भ्रष्टाचार अपनी पराकाष्ठा पर है किसी भी जन सूचना अधिकारी पर अधिरोपित शास्ति की वसूली प्रदेश सरकार द्वारा नहीं की जाती है किन्तु जिन मामलो में पीड़ित पक्ष चाहता है की वसूली हो उन मामलो में भी आप लीपा पोती करेंगे तो कैसे काम चलेगा 
श्री मान जी शासक महत्वपूर्ण नहीं है संबिधान महत्वपूर्ण है 
श्री मान जी इस समय तो शासक हर किसी को ठोक देना चाहता है जो सही बोलता है तो फिर ठोकना शुरू कर दीजिए 
श्री मान जी जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर के विरुद्ध नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किया जाय क्यों की उन्होंने नियम विरुद्ध कार्य करके कानून तोड़ने वालो का संरक्षण किया है और एक संबैधानिक संस्था के आदेश को दरकिनार किया है जो आराजकता की श्रेणी में आता है 
जब जनसूचना अधिकारी तेजस्कर पांडेय राज्य सूचना आयोग भी सूचना देने का निवेदन किया जिलाधिकारी से फिर भी उन्होंने नहीं दिया अर्थात पचासो आवेदनों के पश्चात् भी जिलाधिकारी ने शास्ति की वसूली नहीं की 
R.T.I. Act has been put into dustbin by the Yogi and Modi government quite obviously from the lawlessness and anarchy of public functionaries.
PIO may provide access to information in regard to recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs. 
1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases. 
2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC. 
3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué.
Undoubtedly public functionaries in the state of Uttar Pradesh are not providing any information under Right to Information Act 2005 because of rampant corruption in the government machinery but if the matter taken into account after the interference of the office of his excellency, then they must provide the information concerned with the recovery of penalty imposed on four wrongdoer public information officers. For detail visit the following link.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows. 

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; 

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence; 

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement. 

  2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the status of the R.T.I. communique submitted online by the information seeker.

Registration Number DPTAR/R/2019/60037
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 29/11/2019
Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 14/01/2020
Reason for Rejection :- Rule 4(5).
Remarks:-
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454413939
Email-ID satyendra.13939@gov.in
   3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following information is sought by the information seeker.
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
 
* Public Authority Administrative Reforms Department
 
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DPTAR/R/2019/60037
Date of Filing 29/11/2019
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
  Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought PIO may provide access to information in regard to recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs.
 1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases. 
2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC. 
3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué.
* Concerned PIO Jivan Chandra Pant
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) 

  4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the status of the appeal submitted by the information seeker.  
Registration Number DPTAR/A/2020/60001
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 14/01/2020
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 20/03/2020
Reply :- Decision of PIO is correct. For point 3, information cannot be dislesed as per Rule 4(2)(b)(ii). Hence, first appeal disposed.
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454413939
Email-ID satyendra.13939@gov.in

  5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following is the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
 
* Public Authority Administrative Reforms Department
 
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DPTAR/R/2019/60037
Request Registration Date 29/11/2019
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
* PIO of Public Authority approached Jivan Chandra Pant
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Respected First Appellate Authority, the appellant kindly draw the due attention of the Honourable Sir to following submissions. 
1-SPIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 
2-SPIO violated subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 
3-SPIO can only deny sought information under section 8 and 9 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 but did not do so so action must be taken. 4-UPSIC had directed to ensure the compliance of recovery orders to D.M. Mirzapur so the matter is concerned with only D.M. and if D.M. is anarchist then the department of administrative reform. Consequently, SPIO itself violated sub clause 5 of clause 4 of notification as details attached.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) 

 खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा | 

             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-30/04/2021           Yours sincerely

                                   Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 

Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar


 Pradesh, Pin code-231001. 

2 attachments
img004.jpg
97K
Yogi as anti-corruption crusader_ Undoubtedly whatever damages done by the Modi and Yogi government in 10 years, congress might not do in 60 years.pdf
13874K

Comments

  1. श्री मान जी शासक महत्वपूर्ण नहीं है संबिधान महत्वपूर्ण है
    श्री मान जी इस समय तो शासक हर किसी को ठोक देना चाहता है जो सही बोलता है तो फिर ठोकना शुरू कर दीजिए
    श्री मान जी जिलाधिकारी मिर्ज़ापुर के विरुद्ध नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किया जाय क्यों की उन्होंने नियम विरुद्ध कार्य करके कानून तोड़ने वालो का संरक्षण किया है और एक संबैधानिक संस्था के आदेश को दरकिनार किया है जो आराजकता की श्रेणी में आता है
    जब जनसूचना अधिकारी तेजस्कर पांडेय राज्य सूचना आयोग भी सूचना देने का निवेदन किया जिलाधिकारी से फिर भी उन्होंने नहीं दिया अर्थात पचासो आवेदनों के पश्चात् भी जिलाधिकारी ने शास्ति की वसूली नहीं की

    ReplyDelete
  2. In 2018 ering public information officers in Mirzapur district were penalized with the pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 per public information officer by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission in the matter of information seeker but recovery still not made and order not complied by the government. Order of Uttar Pradesh state information commission is still not complied by the district magistrate Mirzapur which is a mockery of the law of land but who will take action against the district magistrate who acted against the spirit of the constitution of this country to please the political masters and corrupt people in the system.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Right to Information act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authority and section 20 of The Right to Information act 2005 enables the central information commission and state Information Commission to impose pecuniary penalties on the wrongdoer Public Information Officer but both the central and state government has hatched the conspiracy to dilute the provisions or you can say that indirectly they made the provisions of section 20 of the right Information act 2005 impotent by not complying the recovery orders of the information commissions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is characteristics of a good governance that its function must be transparent and accountable but where is transparency and accountability if the right to information act 2005 has been thrown into the dustbin by the current incumbent of this country and state. Section 20 of right to information act 2005 is the backbone of the act but if no pecuniary penalty imposed by the the state information commission or central information commission will be imposed on the wrongdoer public information officers then how the provisions of the right to information act 2005 will be enforced by the concerned constitutional functionaries and there will be no fear of the penal action in the wrongdoer public staffs who are making a mockery of the provisions of the right to information act 2005.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us