Enter Registration Number DOCAF/R/E/20/00565 Name Preeti Singh Date of filing 28/07/2020 Public Authority Department of Consumer Affairs
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF Date of action 07/08/2020
Reply :- ...... View Document
CPIO Details :- T T K Muan
Phone: 23384872 ttk.muan@nic.in
First Appellate Authority Details :- Sita Ram Meena PG
Phone: 011-23387737 dirpg-ca@gov.in
Nodal Officer Details :- Telephone Number 01123381233 Email Id uspc-ca[at]nic[dot]in
Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Description of Information Sought
1-Detail of the manufacturing company as not available on the Amazon online shopping platform.
2-Complaint is made against the seller but grievance is redressed through the report submitted by the staffs of Amazon online shopping if Amazon is the only facilitator then they must avail the reply of seller.
Provide the provision which allows the sell of the product of an unregistered company.
3-Provide the reason for not taking action against the unregistered company manufacturing whiteboard marker ink and selling openly in the market.
Concerned CPIO P Guite
Provide the reason for not taking action against the unregistered company manufacturing whiteboard marker ink and selling openly in the market.
ReplyDeleteWhether the fake companies can sell their spurious products openly in the regime of Modi Sir ipso facto. Spurious white board Marker can be sold openly by fake companies as no action was taken on the repeated complaints made to the competent authorities.
It seems that in the Government of Modi sir it has been set up practice that they will not provide any information to the information seekers because they know that what ever they are doing that is not in accordance with the law of land and if their corrupt deeds will be exposed in the public through The right to information act 2005 then their image will be ruined before the public of this country so they are withholding the information whatever they have to provide under The right to information act 2005.
ReplyDeleteThey must provide the reason why did they deny the information which was sought by the information seeker quite obvious from the submitted application under right to information act 2005 in the matter which means that they are not interested in taking action against the company which is selling fake articles.
ReplyDeleteIf they are honest then why are they not taking any action in the matter concerned with the deep rooted corruption which is quite obvious from the post that they had provided spurious whiteboard marker ink which is illegal and violating the provisions of consumer protection act.
ReplyDelete