According to advocate case is not taken up, poor litigants irresponsive judiciary.

Allahabad High Court

Daily Status
Allahabad High CourtIn The Court Of :JusticeCase Number :WRIA/0020121/2006RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH  Versus  STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERSDate  : 22-03-2018


Business : p.o.
Short Order : 1-L.O./P.O./S.O.
Next Purpose : For Admission
Next Hearing Date : 30-03-2018
Justice

Allahabad High Court

 

Allahabad High Court

Case Details

Case Type: WRIA
Filing Number: 20121/2006Filing Date: 10-04-2006
Registration Number: 20121/2006Registration Date: 10-04-2006
CNR Number: UPHC01-129183-2006

Case Status

First Hearing Date: 08th January 2018
Next Hearing Date: 30th March 2018
Stage of Case: For Admission
Coram: 5002-MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Bench: Single Bench
State: UTTARPRADESH
District: MIRZAPUR

Petitioner and Advocate

1) RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Address –
Advocate- P.C. CHAUHAN,, P.S.CHAUHAN,S.P. SINGH

 

Respondent and Advocate

1) STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Address –
Advocate – C.S.C.,

 

IA Details

IA Number Party Date of Filing Next Date IA Status
1/2006 (265508/2007 ) RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
06-11-2007 Pending
2/2006 (76919/2006 ) RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
10-04-2006 Pending

History of Case Hearing

Registration Number Judge Business On Date Hearing Date Purpose of hearing
20121/2006 12-04-2006 20-01-2018 For Admission
20121/2006 11-01-2016 Next Date Not Given For Admission
20121/2006 19-07-2016 Next Date Not Given For Admission
20121/2006 25-11-2016 Next Date Not Given For Admission
20121/2006 02-08-2017 Next Date Not Given For Admission
20121/2006 08-01-2018 Next Date Not Given For Admission
20121/2006 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA 13-03-2018 22-03-2018 For Admission
20121/2006 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA 22-03-2018 30-03-2018 For Admission

Allahabad High Court

Daily Status
Allahabad High CourtIn The Court Of :JusticeCase Number :WRIA/0020121/2006RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH  Versus  STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERSDate  : 13-03-2018


Business : p.o.
Short Order : 1-L.O./P.O./S.O.
Next Purpose : For Admission
Next Hearing Date : 22-03-2018
Justice

Allahabad High Court

Daily Status
Allahabad High CourtIn The Court Of :Case Number :WRIA/0020121/2006RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH  Versus  STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERSDate  : 12-04-2006


Short Order : 1-L.O./P.O./S.O.
Next Hearing Date : 20-01-2018
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Whether the wheel of judiciary in this largest democracy in the world has been jammed if not why pending cases are never heard?
2 messages

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 10 January 2018 at 14:09
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>
Subject-Whether it is not cheating with the citizenry that although its cases are listed in the cause list but never heard by the court because court either pay heed to fresh cases or unlisted cases. Following a case of the year, 2006 is being listed since six years but never heard in the court by the judge. This is a model of the pending cases languishing in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Most unfortunate is that next listing date was displaying 01-Jan-2018 but now status is showing that there are no further orders of listing.

With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following status is showing that case is to be listed on 01-Jan-2018 but not listed. Undoubtedly if it was listed it might have faced same consequences as facing since six years but there was an expectation. Here this question arises that why did the concerned not list the case as ordered to be listed on 01-Jan-2018 and now status is displaying that there are no further orders of listing. Whether for listing someone was ordering and now he deferred his order of listing the case.

Case Status – Allahabad

 

Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
Last Listed on: 02/08/2017 in Court No. 17
Next Listing Date: To be listed on 01/01/2018

This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding the status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

 

 

Pasted from <http://allahabadhighcourt.in/casestatus/caseDetailFA.jsp>

  2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following status is showing that there are no further orders of listing the case which explicitly shows that listing is subjected to the arbitrariness of the concerned staffs.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABADStatus – Allahabad

Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
Last Listed on: 08/01/2018 in Court No. 19
Next Listing Date: There is no further orders of listing.

This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

 

From <http://allahabadhighcourt.in/casestatus/caseDetailFA.jsp

3-It is submitted to the Hon’ble Sir that it is most unfortunate that numerous grievances were submitted including following one and those attached to this representation but couldn’t cultivate any result. CPIO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad had made the mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005 repeatedly but who will take action against him? Whether anarchy can be tolerated in the name of independence of the judiciary or because of fear contempt of court proceedings.

Grievance Status

Registration Number : DEPOJ/E/2018/00074
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt : 09 Jan 2018
Received by : Department of Justice
Forwarded to : Department of Justice
Contact Address : Jaisalmer House,
    Mansingh Road,
    New Delhi110011
Contact Number : 23381496
Grievance Description : Please ensure transparency in the function of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Please take a glance of attached PDF documents with this representation.
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback : Poor
Date of Action : 09 Jan 2018
Details : The grievance has been forwarded to the Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for further action, as appropriate.

Status as on 09 Jan 2018

 

From <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2018/01/not-single-listed-case-is-being-heard_70.html

                                        This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that it can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

                                          Yours sincerely
                             Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

 

Not a single listed case is being heard in the High Court OF judicature at Allahabad.pdf
365K

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 24 January 2018 at 00:17
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>

Subject-Whether in the name of independence of judiciary, tyranny and lawlessness can be tolerated? Under article 32 of the constitution of India, Right to justice is our fundamental right but how this right is preserved and protected if there is huge pending of cases in our courts and in the name judicial reforms, the only citizenry is being misled. Famous quote-Force without justice is tyranny and justice without force is impotent. Undoubtedly our judicial members are well equipped with the extraordinary powers but with these immense powers, there must be a regulatory mechanism.

In regards to the function of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, no listed cases are ever heard by the judges as their court time is over in the hearing of the cases filed as fresh and then unlisted cases. Here this question arises that if they had not to hear the cases, then why the cases are listed, as such cases create the false expectations in the mind of poor litigants that their case may be disposed of as the list at the serial number such and such?

The negative aspect of such dealings is that one case of my father of the year 2006 case number- 20121 has been listed so many times but never heard. Moreover in the meantime we heard that our advocate Mr Satya Prakash Singh (S. P. Singh) now doing practice in the supreme court and case was being listed as being displayed on the website so my father being impatient asked me to take him Allahabad and paid Rs.10000.00 to new Advocate Mr Pahal Singh Chauhan (P. S.Chauhan) (undoubtedly his demand was greater but after request he agreed) and the he asked to pay Rs.1000.00 to his clerk but we paid only Rs.500.00. If we were apprised of the fact that listed cases displaying on the website of High Court of judicature at Allahabad are never heard then why did we pay our hard earned money to advocate and his clerk?

With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whatever information is sought from the central public information officer under Right to Information Act 2005, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, is not made available by him and first appellate authority registrar general, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad speaks in the same tuning. Right to Information Act 2005 was passed by the temple of rule making body of this country in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but it seems that public authority High Court of judicature at Allahabad because of its accountable public functionaries outwardly accepted the provisions of transparency act by making its provisions impotent which is ultravires to Right to Information Act 2005 and rest of the job to make the august act null is performed by central public information officer and first appellate authority, registrar general, High Court of judicature at Allahabad.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that moreover staffs of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad have no regards for the direction of the chief information commissioner of India as they took under teeth the direction of aforementioned constitutional authority by not providing sought information to your applicant. Whether it is not the reflection of lawlessness and tyranny in the function of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad? Think about the quantum of lawlessness that concerned staffs don’t think about the setup precedent by them that if they will not abide by the direction of a constitutional body, how others will have regards to directions of High Court itself. Sir rule of law never discriminates and its supremacy must remain intact but few people through their arbitrariness and tyranny making efforts to suppress the rule of law.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to the famous quote of the father of the nation Mahatma Gandhi when I despair, I remember that all through History the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it always”. I always meditate on aforementioned quotes of the father of the nation. 

   This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that it can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

                                          Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.  

img380img381img400img401

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
yogimpsingh
2 years ago

The negative aspect of such dealings is that one case of my father of the year 2006 case number- 20121 has been listed so many times but never heard. Moreover in the meantime we heard that our advocate Mr Satya Prakash Singh (S. P. Singh) now doing practice in the supreme court and case was being listed as being displayed on the website so my father being impatient asked me to take him Allahabad and paid Rs.10000.00 to new Advocate Mr Pahal Singh Chauhan (P. S.Chauhan) (undoubtedly his demand was greater but after request he agreed) and the he asked to pay Rs.1000.00 to his clerk but we paid only Rs.500.00. If we were apprised of the fact that listed cases displaying on the website of High Court of judicature at Allahabad are never heard then why did we pay our hard earned money to advocate and his clerk?